User Experience of the “EcoHarvest” Organic Waste Management Application Based on Gamification Using the Design Thinking Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33050/ccit.v19i2.4397Keywords:
UI/UX Design, Organic Waste, Design Thinking, Gamification, Eco-friendly AppAbstract
Household organic waste management remains a major challenge in urban areas due to the lack of integrated collection services and low public motivation. This study aims to design the user interface of the “EcoHarvest” application, which serves as an organic waste drop-off platform connecting users with waste management partners. The Design Thinking method is employed to ensure the design solution aligns with user needs for convenience and transparency. The design outcomes include features for tracking waste weight, a drop-off location map, and an incentive-based point system. Based on usability testing using the System Usability Scale (SUS) with 50 respondents, the application achieved a score of 69.2 (Grade B). This indicates that the EcoHarvest app design is considered highly effective, efficient, and satisfying in helping users manage organic waste in their daily lives.
Downloads
References
Waringin Margi Yusmaman, Herri Widiyanto, Siti Nur Rohmah, and Muhammad Ali Akbarsyah, “Bahaya Lingkungan Pada Open Dumping Sampah Organik Perkotaan,” Jurnal Bengawan Solo Pusat Kajian Penelitian dan Pengembangan Daerah Kota Surakarta, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 85–101, Dec. 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.58684/jbs.v2i2.83.
Kemenko PMK, “7,2 Juta Ton Sampah di Indonesia Belum Terkelola Dengan Baik,” Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Pembangunan Manusia dan Kebudayaan, 2023.
Pemerintah Kota Cirebon, “Bahaya dan Manfaat Sampah Organik - Dinas Lingkungan Hidup,” Cirebonkota.go.id, 2025. https://dlh.cirebonkota.go.id/artikel/bahaya-dan-manfaat-sampah-organik (accessed Feb. 19, 2026).
Ni Nengah Widiani, Syahrullah Syahrullah, Rahma Laila, Chairunnisa Ar Lamasitudju, and Dwi Shinta Angreni, “UI/UX Design of Jepun Bali Store Product Ordering Application Using Design Thinking Method,” CCIT (Creative Communication and Innovative Technology) Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.33050/ccit.v19i1.3965.
K. Wenker, “A systematic literature review on persuasive technology at the workplace,” Patterns, vol. 3, no. 8, p. 100545, Aug. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2022.100545.
S. Venturi, K. Zulauf, R. Cuel, and R. Wagner, "Trash to treasure: Gamification and informed recycling behavior," Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 215, p. 108108, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.108108.
D. Yulianti, K. C. Febriantika, Z. D. Priamita, and P. K. F. Ananto, "Rubbish Go: An Innovative Community-Based Platform for Digital Waste Management in Indonesia," Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 12-18, Oct. 2025.
Ömer Faruk Ursavaş, “Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model (UTAUT),” pp. 111–133, Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10846-4_6.
S. Park et al., “Bridging Gulfs in UI Generation through Semantic Guidance,” arXiv.org, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3772318.3791966.
Satu Grönman, E. Lindfors, and Marja-Leena Rönkkö, “Design thinking in early childhood education and care. A literature review and consideration from the perspective of young learners’ craft, design, and technology education,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Oct. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09944-z.
V. Arifin, V. Handayani, L. K. Wardhani, H. B. Suseno, and S. U. Masruroh, “User Interface and Exprience Gamification-Based E-Learning with Design Science Research Methodology”, MATRIK, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 165–176, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.30812/matrik.v22i1.2427.
K. S. Lestari and H. Henderi, “Model Dashboard Information System untuk Peningkatan Kualitas Pengelolaan Jurnal Ilmiah,” Jurnal Ilmiah Matrik, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 142–149, Aug. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.33557/jurnalmatrik.v23i2.1405.
