PENERAPAN AHP DAN TOPSIS UNTUK PENILAIAN KELAYAKAN KREDIT PADA BPR CENTRADANA KAPUAS PONTIANAK
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Financing for business or consumption is one of the main purpose of a bank. BPR is mini part of Indonesian banking system that functions like conventional banks with limited or smaller role. BPR also finances for car loans. In practice, when administrative assessments for car loan applications are not met, subjective assessment is needed to further assess car loan applications. The purpose of this study is to develop decision support for the latter problem. This study employs AHP and TOPSIS as decision support method. 5C’s are used for assesment which results in highest preference in Character (0.36), followed by Capacity (0.28), Capital (0.19), Collateral (0.14), Condition (0.04). Fifteen sub criterias are also developed to further assess the loan and TOPSIS is used for alternative selection. The result of this study proves AHP and TOPSIS are reliable for supporting multi criteria decision making, especially in assessing and approving car credit loan at BPR Centradana Kapuas Pontianak.
Downloads
Article Details
References
[2] Bank Indonesia, 2017, Ikhtisar Perbankan, http://www.bi.go.id/id/perbankan/ikhtisar/lemba ga/Contents/Default.aspx, diakses 11-01-2017
[3] Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 2017, Bank Perkreditan Rakyat, http://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal /perbankan/Pages/Bank-Perkredi tan-Rakyat.aspx, diakses 10-02-2017
[4] Dedy, Mirna, 2016, Aset BPR Kalbar Mengalami Perlambatan, http://pontianak.tribunnews. com/2016/02/17/aset-bpr-kalbar-mengalami-perlambatan, diakses 15-01-2017
[5] Greatness, Steven, 2014, Bank Centradana Kapuas Tiga Kali Berturut-turut mendapatkan Infobank Award, http://pontianak.tribunnews.com/2014/09/02/bank-centradana-kapuas-tiga -kali-berturut-raih-infobank-award, diakses tanggal 11-01-2017
[6] ERTUĞ, Z. K., 2014, The Data Envelopment Analytic Hierarchy Process (DEAHP) Approach in the Evaluation of Commercial Credit Applications, European Journal of Business and Management, vol 6 no 35, hal 132-146,
[7] Yurdakul, M., Tansel, Y., 2004, AHP approach in the credit evaluation of the manufacturing firms in Turkey, International Journal of Production Economics, vol 88, hal269-289
[8] Mandic, K., Delibasic, B., Knezevic, S., Benkovic, S., 2014, Analysis of the financial parameters of serbian banks through the application of the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods, Enonomic Modelling, vol 43, hal 30-37
[9] Karim, R., Karmaker, C. L., 2016, Machine Selection by AHP and TOPSIS Methods. American Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol 4 No 1 Hal 7-13.
[10] Saaty, T. L. 2008, Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciencesVol 1 No1, hal 83-98.
[11]Saaty, Thomas L., 2000, Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory with The Analytic Hierarchy Process (Analytic Hierarchy Process Series, Vol. 6), First Edition, RWS Publications.
[12]Yoon, K., Hwang, Ching-Lai., Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. A State-of-the-art Survey, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1981.
[13] Kusumadewi, S., Hartati, S., Harjoko, A., & Wardoyo, R. Fuzzy Multi-Atribute Decision Making (1st Edition ed.). Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2006